XL GPW Kongresowy Turniej Indywidualny 305: W Gaweł | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | H Stasiewicz-A Bakalarz,M Barylewski-* | 13 | WE | 4![]() | N | ![]() | +1 | -650 | 25.64% | 25.64% | ||
H Stasiewicz-M Barylewski,*-A Bakalarz | 14 | WE | 3![]() | E | ![]() | +1 | +170 | 88.46% | 57.05% | |||
H Stasiewicz-*,A Bakalarz-M Barylewski | 15 | NS | 1![]() | S | ![]() | -3 | -800 | 7.69% | 40.60% | |||
2 | J Żebrowski-H Urban,K Urbańczyk-* | 10 | WE | 2![]() | E | ![]() | = | +110 | 78.21% | 50.00% | ||
J Żebrowski-K Urbańczyk,*-H Urban | 11 | WE | 3![]() | S | ![]() | +2 | -460 | 34.62% | 46.92% | |||
J Żebrowski-*,H Urban-K Urbańczyk | 12 | NS | 3![]() | E | ![]() | = | -400 | 47.37% | 47.00% | |||
3 | D Puczyński-D Skowronek,R Pepłoński-* | 7 | WE | 4![]() | W | ![]() | -1 | -100 | 61.54% | 49.08% | ||
D Puczyński-R Pepłoński,*-D Skowronek | 8 | WE | 4![]() | N | ![]() | +1 | -450 | 24.36% | 45.99% | |||
D Puczyński-*,D Skowronek-R Pepłoński | 9 | NS | 4![]() | E | ![]() | -1 | +100 | 83.33% | 50.14% | |||
4 | H Borewicz-S Cieślak,E Czubak-* | 4 | WE | 6![]() | E | ![]() | = | +1370 | 79.49% | 53.07% | ||
H Borewicz-E Czubak,*-S Cieślak | 5 | WE | 1![]() | S | ![]() | -1 | +100 | 8.97% | 49.06% | |||
H Borewicz-*,S Cieślak-E Czubak | 6 | NS | 4![]() | W | ![]() | -2 | +200 | 42.31% | 48.50% | |||
5 | I Czajka-M Urbaniak,P Zawada-* | 1 | WE | 3![]() | N | ![]() | +2 | -460 | 47.44% | 48.42% | ||
I Czajka-P Zawada,*-M Urbaniak | 2 | WE | 6![]() | S | ![]() | +1 | -1460 | 3.85% | 45.23% | |||
I Czajka-*,M Urbaniak-P Zawada | 3 | NS | 5![]() | W | ![]() | -2 | +500 | 97.44% | 48.71% | |||
6 | *-S Niajko,A Borewicz-Z Skibicki | 28 | NS | 2![]() | S | ![]() | = | +110 | 57.69% | 49.27% | ||
*-A Borewicz,Z Skibicki-S Niajko | 29 | NS | 3![]() | N | ![]() | -2 | -500 | 6.41% | 46.75% | |||
*-Z Skibicki,S Niajko-A Borewicz | 30 | NS | 4![]() | N | ![]() | +1 | +450 | 88.46% | 49.07% | |||
7 | *-R Jagielski,D Syncerek-I Grynczewski | 16 | NS | 4![]() | W | ![]() | -1 | +100 | 76.92% | 50.54% | ||
*-D Syncerek,I Grynczewski-R Jagielski | 17 | NS | 1![]() | S | ![]() | +1 | +120 | 93.59% | 52.69% | |||
*-I Grynczewski,R Jagielski-D Syncerek | 18 | NS | 3![]() | W | ![]() | -2 | +100 | 84.62% | 54.21% | |||
8 | *-P Łopusiewicz,M Dąbrowski-M Syncerek | 19 | NS | 4![]() | S | ![]() | -3 | -150 | 17.95% | 52.56% | ||
*-M Dąbrowski,M Syncerek-P Łopusiewicz | 20 | NS | 5![]() | E | ![]() | = | -600 | 92.31% | 54.29% | |||
*-M Syncerek,P Łopusiewicz-M Dąbrowski | 21 | NS | 4![]() | N | ![]() | = | +130 | 74.36% | 55.13% | |||
9 | *-R Radwański,G Piotrowski-K Szwenkel | 22 | NS | 3![]() | N | ![]() | +3 | +490 | 41.03% | 54.56% | ||
*-G Piotrowski,K Szwenkel-R Radwański | 23 | NS | 2![]() | S | ![]() | +1 | +110 | 65.38% | 54.98% | |||
*-K Szwenkel,R Radwański-G Piotrowski | 24 | NS | 4![]() | S | ![]() | +1 | +450 | 81.56% | 55.96% | |||
10 | *-A Lubojemski,I Shpuntou-G Superson | 25 | NS | 3![]() | E | ![]() | = | -600 | 71.79% | 56.53% | ||
*-I Shpuntou,G Superson-A Lubojemski | 26 | NS | 4![]() | W | ![]() | +1 | -650 | 33.33% | 55.73% | |||
*-G Superson,A Lubojemski-I Shpuntou | 27 | NS | 6![]() | N | ![]() | +1 | +1020 | 97.44% | 57.12% | |||
SUMA: | 57.12% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 57.12% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 23 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2012-08-31 o 15:37:22