XL GPW Kongresowy Turniej Indywidualny 302: M Bielawski | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | I Czajka-D Skowronek,K Urbańczyk-* | 4 | WE | 5![]() | E | ![]() | -1 | -100 | 28.21% | 28.21% | ||
I Czajka-K Urbańczyk,*-D Skowronek | 5 | WE | 2![]() | E | ![]() | +2 | +180 | 89.74% | 58.97% | |||
I Czajka-*,D Skowronek-K Urbańczyk | 6 | NS | 4![]() | N | ![]() | +1 | +450 | 78.21% | 65.38% | |||
2 | H Stasiewicz-S Cieślak,R Pepłoński-* | 1 | WE | 3![]() | N | ![]() | +2 | -460 | 47.44% | 60.90% | ||
H Stasiewicz-R Pepłoński,*-S Cieślak | 2 | WE | 4![]() | S | ![]() | +2 | -680 | 87.18% | 66.15% | |||
H Stasiewicz-*,S Cieślak-R Pepłoński | 3 | NS | 5![]() | N | ![]() | -3 | -500 | 3.85% | 55.77% | |||
3 | J Żebrowski-M Urbaniak,E Czubak-* | 13 | WE | 4![]() | S | ![]() | -1 | +100 | 89.74% | 60.62% | ||
J Żebrowski-E Czubak,*-M Urbaniak | 14 | WE | 4![]() | S | ![]() | -2 | +100 | 12.82% | 54.65% | |||
J Żebrowski-*,M Urbaniak-E Czubak | 15 | NS | 3![]() | W | ![]() | +2 | -460 | 43.59% | 53.42% | |||
4 | D Puczyński-A Bakalarz,P Zawada-* | 10 | WE | 2![]() | E | ![]() | = | +110 | 78.21% | 55.90% | ||
D Puczyński-P Zawada,*-A Bakalarz | 11 | WE | 3![]() | S | ![]() | = | -400 | 87.18% | 58.74% | |||
D Puczyński-*,A Bakalarz-P Zawada | 12 | NS | APP | 60.00% | 58.85% | |||||||
5 | H Borewicz-H Urban,M Barylewski-* | 7 | WE | 4![]() | N | ![]() | -1 | +100 | 78.21% | 60.34% | ||
H Borewicz-M Barylewski,*-H Urban | 8 | WE | 4![]() | N | ![]() | +1 | -450 | 24.36% | 57.77% | |||
H Borewicz-*,H Urban-M Barylewski | 9 | NS | 4![]() | E | ![]() | = | -620 | 46.15% | 56.99% | |||
6 | *-A Lubojemski,G Piotrowski-I Grynczewski | 19 | NS | 4![]() | S | ![]() | -1 | -50 | 53.85% | 56.79% | ||
*-G Piotrowski,I Grynczewski-A Lubojemski | 20 | NS | 4![]() | W | ![]() | +2 | -680 | 55.13% | 56.70% | |||
*-I Grynczewski,A Lubojemski-G Piotrowski | 21 | NS | 1![]() | S | ![]() | +3 | +180 | 93.59% | 58.75% | |||
7 | *-S Niajko,I Shpuntou-M Syncerek | 22 | NS | 5![]() | N | ![]() | +1 | +1240 | 97.44% | 60.78% | ||
*-I Shpuntou,M Syncerek-S Niajko | 23 | NS | 1![]() | W | ![]() | -2 | +500 | 98.72% | 62.68% | |||
*-M Syncerek,S Niajko-I Shpuntou | 24 | NS | 3![]() | S | ![]() | +2 | +730 | 99.96% | 64.45% | |||
8 | *-R Jagielski,A Borewicz-K Szwenkel | 25 | NS | 3![]() | W | ![]() | +2 | -660 | 17.95% | 62.34% | ||
*-A Borewicz,K Szwenkel-R Jagielski | 26 | NS | 3![]() | E | ![]() | +2 | -660 | 6.41% | 59.91% | |||
*-K Szwenkel,R Jagielski-A Borewicz | 27 | NS | 6![]() | N | ![]() | = | +980 | 74.36% | 60.51% | |||
9 | *-P Łopusiewicz,D Syncerek-G Superson | 28 | NS | 4![]() | N | ![]() | -1 | -100 | 33.33% | 59.42% | ||
*-D Syncerek,G Superson-P Łopusiewicz | 29 | NS | 2![]() | E | ![]() | +3 | -210 | 19.23% | 57.88% | |||
*-G Superson,P Łopusiewicz-D Syncerek | 30 | NS | 2![]() | S | ![]() | +3 | +200 | 64.10% | 58.11% | |||
10 | *-R Radwański,M Dąbrowski-Z Skibicki | 16 | NS | 3![]() | N | ![]() | = | +530 | 100.00% | 59.60% | ||
*-M Dąbrowski,Z Skibicki-R Radwański | 17 | NS | 2![]() | S | ![]() | -1 | -50 | 41.03% | 58.96% | |||
*-Z Skibicki,R Radwański-M Dąbrowski | 18 | NS | 4![]() | S | ![]() | -1 | -200 | 25.64% | 57.85% | |||
SUMA: | 57.85% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 57.85% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 21 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2012-08-31 o 15:37:22