KTI 10: W Klapper | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | *-E Treichel,K Walędzik-A Demczyk | 13 | NS | 3 | W | 8 | -1 | +100 | 22.73% | 22.73% | ||
*-K Walędzik,A Demczyk-E Treichel | 14 | NS | 3 | W | 6 | +2 | -460 | 19.32% | 21.02% | |||
*-A Demczyk,E Treichel-K Walędzik | 15 | NS | 4 | S | A | +1 | +650 | 63.64% | 35.23% | |||
2 | *-M Wróbel,R Michalski-P Łyczkowski | 1 | NS | 3 | S | A | -1 | -50 | 27.92% | 33.40% | ||
*-R Michalski,P Łyczkowski-M Wróbel | 2 | NS | 6× | N | 10 | -2 | -500 | 3.41% | 27.40% | |||
*-P Łyczkowski,M Wróbel-R Michalski | 3 | NS | 3 | N | K | +1 | +170 | 30.68% | 27.95% | |||
3 | *-F Wrona,Z Santkiewicz-M Jurczak | 4 | NS | 3 | N | 10 | -1 | -100 | 30.68% | 28.34% | ||
*-Z Santkiewicz,M Jurczak-F Wrona | 5 | NS | 5 | N | A | +1 | +620 | 81.82% | 35.02% | |||
*-M Jurczak,F Wrona-Z Santkiewicz | 6 | NS | 2 | E | A | = | -110 | 22.73% | 33.66% | |||
4 | *-D Węgrowicz,J Kiraszczuk-W Janeczek | 7 | NS | 3 | W | 6 | +1 | -630 | 50.00% | 35.29% | ||
*-J Kiraszczuk,W Janeczek-D Węgrowicz | 8 | NS | 5 | W | K | -2 | +100 | 75.57% | 38.95% | |||
*-W Janeczek,D Węgrowicz-J Kiraszczuk | 9 | NS | 4 | E | 6 | +1 | -650 | 38.64% | 38.93% | |||
5 | *-W Sierota,R Pepłoński-P Tuczyński | 10 | NS | 3× | N | J | -2 | -500 | 19.32% | 37.42% | ||
*-R Pepłoński,P Tuczyński-W Sierota | 11 | NS | 2 | N | 2 | = | +120 | 92.05% | 41.32% | |||
*-P Tuczyński,W Sierota-R Pepłoński | 12 | NS | 4 | S | A | = | +130 | 62.50% | 42.73% | |||
6 | J Radecki-*,Ł Trendak-S Młynarczuk | 28 | NS | 3 | W | 9 | -1 | +50 | 38.64% | 42.48% | ||
J Radecki-Ł Trendak,S Młynarczuk-* | 29 | WE | 3 | W | K | = | +110 | 65.91% | 43.85% | |||
J Radecki-S Młynarczuk,*-Ł Trendak | 30 | WE | 3 | W | J | = | +140 | 57.95% | 44.64% | |||
7 | W Sienkiewicz-*,R Nowicki-A Nekhoroshev | 22 | NS | 2 | S | K | +1 | +140 | 81.82% | 46.60% | ||
W Sienkiewicz-R Nowicki,A Nekhoroshev-* | 23 | WE | 3 | N | 5 | = | -140 | 42.05% | 46.37% | |||
W Sienkiewicz-A Nekhoroshev,*-R Nowicki | 24 | WE | 1 | W | J | +1 | +120 | 81.82% | 48.06% | |||
8 | D Skowronek-*,P Klebanovich-K Bączek | 16 | NS | 3 | S | J | +1 | +430 | 62.50% | 48.71% | ||
D Skowronek-P Klebanovich,K Bączek-* | 17 | WE | 3 | S | 2 | -2 | +100 | 75.00% | 49.86% | |||
D Skowronek-K Bączek,*-P Klebanovich | 18 | WE | 4 | W | 5 | = | +420 | 50.00% | 49.86% | |||
9 | T Luzak-*,E Shokhan-A Fronczak | 25 | NS | 3 | N | 4 | +1 | +430 | 13.64% | 48.41% | ||
T Luzak-A Fronczak,*-E Shokhan | 26 | WE | 2 | N | 6 | -1 | +100 | 96.59% | 50.27% | |||
T Luzak-E Shokhan,A Fronczak-* | 27 | WE | 2 | E | K | -1 | -50 | 42.05% | 49.96% | |||
10 | A Tybura-*,S Zlobich-I Marczak | 19 | NS | 3 | W | K | -2 | +200 | 92.05% | 51.46% | ||
A Tybura-S Zlobich,I Marczak-* | 20 | WE | 3 | N | 2 | = | -140 | 10.23% | 50.04% | |||
A Tybura-I Marczak,*-S Zlobich | 21 | WE | 2 | W | 10 | +1 | +110 | 82.95% | 51.14% | |||
SUMA: | 51.14% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 51.14% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 77 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2013-08-30 o 17:11:01